The Benchmark Test
Let’s be real — in football, the 40-yard dash is the headline test.
It’s the number everyone remembers. It might not tell you everything, but it sure tells you something. And for athletes, cutting just a tenth of a second can mean more attention, better offers, and serious momentum.
But here’s the catch: timing it right is harder than it looks.
Hand Timing: The Old Standard
Most of us have done it. Stopwatch in hand, thumb ready, eyes on the line.
It’s quick. It’s cheap. But it’s not accurate.
- 
Human reaction adds anywhere from 0.1 to 0.2 seconds. 
- 
Coaches often start or stop early — even without realizing it. 
- 
A “4.4” hand time usually turns out to be 4.6 or 4.7 electronically. 
It’s fine for a rough check, but not for tracking real progress.
Laser Gates: Closer, but Not Perfect
Laser timing systems are common at showcases. They’re better, no doubt — but they’ve got quirks:
- 
A hand, knee, or head can trigger the start/stop early. 
- 
Setup takes time. Consistency across athletes? Not always. 
- 
In group testing, they slow everything down. 
They look precise, but results can still leave you scratching your head.
NFL Combine Timing: The Gold Standard
At the NFL Combine, they go all out: laser beams, video backup, photo finish systems. It’s elite-level accurate. No reaction time. No guessing. Just data.
But here’s why you’re not using it:
- 
It’s expensive. 
- 
It’s complex. 
- 
You need trained staff. 
It’s the best. It’s just not practical for schools, teams, or coaches working in real-world environments.
What Coaches Actually Need
We don’t need a lab. We need a system that’s:
- 
Consistent — same setup every time. 
- 
Repeatable — so you know if a player’s getting better. 
- 
Practical — fast to set up, easy to use with groups, and built for the field. 
Accuracy is important. But consistency is everything. That’s what makes progress measurable — and trustworthy.
Where Freelap Fits In
This is why coaches are using Freelap:
- 
Fully automatic timing — no reaction delay, no bias. 
- 
Wireless and portable — set it up in minutes, anywhere. 
- 
Scalable — works great for individuals or full teams. 
- 
Center-of-mass timing — triggered by the athlete, not a hand or knee. 
- 
Data you can trust — because it’s repeatable and rock-solid. 
Freelap gives you combine-level precision without the cost or complexity. Your athletes get legit times. You get clean data.
It’s a win.
Quick Recap: What Works, What Doesn’t
| Timing Method | Pros | Cons | 
|---|---|---|
| Stopwatch | Fast, easy | ±0.2s error, human bias | 
| Laser Gates | Better accuracy | False triggers, setup hassle | 
| NFL-Style Systems | Top-tier precision | Expensive, not scalable | 
| Freelap | Fast, accurate, portable | Real-world solution | 
In The End
What’s the most accurate way to time a 40?
- 
For the NFL Combine: full electronic setup with video. 
- 
For everyone else: a repeatable system that removes human error and builds trust. 
In the end, it’s not just about running a fast 40 — it’s about knowing the time is real, and knowing week to week if your athletes are improving.
That’s what Freelap does — and why more coaches are making the switch.




Share:
What’s the Best Way to Time a Flying 30m?
How Do You Accurately Measure Ski Training Times?